That (insert shtick here) Guy

May 1, 2009

By Ian Hunter…

Ever wondered exactly what qualities make you like your favourite player? After doing some soul-searching, I have discovered just what it is that draws me in to certain baseball players. Their shtick.

For example, take Blue Jays reliever turned starting pitcher Brian Tallet. Prior to his facial hair addition, he was simply known as the dependable reliever on the team. But now that he’s sporting a moustache of Ron Burgundy proportions, he’s know as “that moustache guy” - or even better … Brian Tallet Moustache Cop.

Roy Halladay is so clean-cut and professional, that fans took it upon themselves to create a shtick that Halladay is half-man, half-machine (or maybe 100 percent cyborg, I’m not completely sure). His extremely high level of efficiency on the mound could only be explained by a neural processor made 50 years in the future which can calculate scouting reports on opponents in a matter of milliseconds.

Scott Richmond might seem like a very quiet character, but that’s simply him being “that Canadian Guy”. As the token Canadian on the Blue Jays, his job is to provide the team with NHL playoff updates and reminisce about old episodes of Degrassi.

Kevin Millar is known for so many different mannerisms and catchphrases that he could probably even be referred to as “that shtick guy”. There was much talk in Spring Training about how Millar would be a great boost to the clubhouse because of his fun-loving attitude. Fortunately, he’s actually put up pretty decent numbers so far this season to warrant a spot on the roster. Though, I’m still waiting for him to lay down his Blue Jays version of “Cowboy Up”.

Call it a shtick, call it a gimmick, or just call it an excuse for a player to act a certain way. But at the end of the day, fans will always remember those players who have a shtick

2009 NHL Stanley Cup Playoff Predictions: Round Two

May 1, 2009

By Derek Harmsworth… Well, the San Jose Sharks and Calgary Flames are cleaning out their lockers, and that can only mean one thing.

The second round of the playoffs is about to begin.

But this isn’t meant to be a dig at either organization, or any others that bowed out after the quarterfinals; instead, it’s another chance to look ahead. Another chance to grab some bragging rights. Another chance to take a wild guess and giggle like a schoolgirl if, somehow, the stars align and your predictions actually pan out.

Round one went well for me, and after going 6-2, it’s time for the second round predictions.

So without further ado, or filler text, on with the predictions for the second round.

Western Conference

(2) Detroit Red Wings Vs. (8) Anaheim Ducks

The first round of the 2009 NHL Stanley Cup playoffs provided plenty of excitement and drama; still, it’s tough not be excited about this one, as Detroit and Anaheim will meet up for the second time in the past three years. In their last playoff meeting, the Ducks beat Detroit in the West finals en route to their first Stanley Cup.

That was just the most recent meeting between the two, who have quite the interesting playoff history.

The Red Wings, despite finishing second in the conference, were still looked at by many as the class of the league, and they proved it in round one, dismantling the upstart Columbus Blue Jackets in a four-game sweep. The Ducks, meanwhile, delivered an “upset” of sorts, knocking the Presidents Trophy-winning San Jose Sharks from the playoffs in six games.

The forwards look like they will match up quite well against each other. Ryan Getzlaf has been an early MVP of the postseason, and the Ducks are also getting quality contributions from Corey Perry and Bobby Ryan.

The Red Wings, meanwhile, are likely the deeper of the two at the forward position. Detroit has six forwards playing at a point-a-game pace, and as is their M.O., they got a great scoring balance in the first round to dump the Blue Jackets from the playoffs.

Five of Detroit’s six defensemen were able to register at least one point in the four games of the first round, with Brett Lebda being the only Wing left off the score sheet. Nicklas Lidstrom and Niklas Kronwall each had four points in four games, with Brian Rafalski right behind with three.

Anaheim, meanwhile, have the two-headed monster of Scott Niedermayer and Chris Pronger, which is being complemented this season by the emergence of Ryan Whitney and James Wisniewski, both deadline acquisitions. Francois Beauchemin and Sheldon Brookbank round out the top six for Anaheim.

While the defense didn’t have too many problems with the Sharks, there is no question Detroit is a deeper, more skilled team, which may be a problem for younger D-men like Wisniewski and Brookbank.

In goal, we have two of the playoff’s top goalies who will go head to head. Chris Osgood entered the playoffs under heavy criticism but let his play do the talking.

Osgood was very sharp in three of the four games this round. During the fourth game he seemingly had a meltdown, but an injury may have been nagging him. The Wings are hoping the long rest will do his lower body good. Osgood was having trouble pushing from one side of the net to the other.

Jonas Hiller, meanwhile, came out of nowhere to grab the Ducks’ starting spot this year, and once inserted for Game One against San Jose, he never looked back. Hiller has been a great story in the playoffs for Anaheim, posting a goals against of 1.64 and a save percentage of .957.

We’re in the second round. There are no choices here. I could just as easily see this series going either way, but in the end, I think Detroit has deeper, more experienced forwards.

Prediction: Detroit in Seven

(3) Vancouver Canucks Vs. (4) Chicago Blackhawks

The Chicago Blackhawks proved a lot in the first round. Among those was the fact that, despite being young and inexperienced, they would not let anyone intimidate them or push them around. The Blackhawks got balanced scoring and great efforts from role players to oust the Flames in six games.

The Canucks, meanwhile, engaged in a spirited series with the upstart St. Louis Blues. Vancouver, among other things, got fantastic goaltending from Roberto Luongo to sweep the Blues in four, though the series was probably closer than the score indicates.

There isn’t much not to like about this series. Perhaps if you have to work early, the late time could be an issue, but who needs sick days anyways?

If you’re not excited about this series, just click here for a refresher. This is from the last time the two teams played.

Both teams have great young scorers who are playing well in this postseason, and both have shown a willingness to get physical, which should make for a fantastic series.

I want to pick the Blackhawks because they showed me a lot in round one, but in the end, I have to go with the team who I feel has the edge in goal.

Prediction: Vancouver in six